Timeline of ND abortion ban court cases

Published: Sep 13, 2024 Duration: 00:02:00 Category: News & Politics

Trending searches: abortion ban
ABORTION DEBATE ONCE AGAIN. THE JURY FOUND HIM GUILTY... BUT NOT OF THE BIGGEST AGAINST AGAINST HIM. AGAINST HIM. AND AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS ABOUT AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE AGAINST HIM. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE INCREASE IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in IN TEENAGE VAPE USE. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on the overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on the overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on the legality overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on the legality of overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there has letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there has letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there has been letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there has been a letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there has been a long letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there has been a long and letting the states decide on the legality of abortion, there has been a long and complicated legality of abortion, there has been a long and complicated legality of abortion, there has been a long and complicated court legality of abortion, there has been a long and complicated court battle legality of abortion, there has been a long and complicated court battle playing legality of abortion, there has been a long and complicated court battle playing out legality of abortion, there has been a long and complicated court battle playing out in been a long and complicated court battle playing out in been a long and complicated court battle playing out in North been a long and complicated court battle playing out in North Dakota. been a long and complicated court battle playing out in North Dakota. Bella been a long and complicated court battle playing out in North Dakota. Bella Kraft court battle playing out in North Dakota. Bella Kraft court battle playing out in North Dakota. Bella Kraft explains. North Dakota. Bella Kraft explains. North Dakota. Bella Kraft explains. In North Dakota. Bella Kraft explains. In 2007 North Dakota. Bella Kraft explains. In 2007 the North Dakota. Bella Kraft explains. In 2007 the state North Dakota. Bella Kraft explains. In 2007 the state legislature explains. In 2007 the state legislature explains. In 2007 the state legislature enacted explains. In 2007 the state legislature enacted a explains. In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger explains. In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger ban" In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger ban" In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe In 2007 the state legislature enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be enacted a "trigger ban" outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. That outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect outlawing abortion if Roe v. Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect in Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect in Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect in 2022 Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect in 2022 after Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect in 2022 after the Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Wade were to ever be overturned. That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling That ban went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying it 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying it was 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying it was up 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states to Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states to Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states to decide Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states to decide if Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states to decide if abortion Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states to decide if abortion was Court quashed the ruling saying it was up for the states to decide if abortion was legal. it was up for the states to decide if abortion was legal. it was up for the states to decide if abortion was legal. The it was up for the states to decide if abortion was legal. The state it was up for the states to decide if abortion was legal. The state's it was up for the states to decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole it was up for the states to decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion clinic, decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion clinic, Red decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women's decide if abortion was legal. The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women's Clinic The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women's Clinic The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged The state's sole abortion clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that trigger clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that trigger ban, clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that trigger ban, which clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that trigger ban, which went clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all clinic, Red River Women's Clinic and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the way and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the way to and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the way to the and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the way to the state and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's and others challenged that trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest court. trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest court. In trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest court. In 2023 trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE trigger ban, which went all the way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. way to the state's highest court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. Several court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. Several court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. Several months court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. Several months later court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote court. In 2023 the STATE Supreme Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up a Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up a new Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up a new law Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up a new law to Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up a new law to include Court blocked the law. Several months later lawmakers wrote up a new law to include more months later lawmakers wrote up a new law to include more months later lawmakers wrote up a new law to include more exceptions months later lawmakers wrote up a new law to include more exceptions for months later lawmakers wrote up a new law to include more exceptions for medical a new law to include more exceptions for medical a new law to include more exceptions for medical complications a new law to include more exceptions for medical complications and a new law to include more exceptions for medical complications and in a new law to include more exceptions for medical complications and in cases a new law to include more exceptions for medical complications and in cases of exceptions for medical complications and in cases of exceptions for medical complications and in cases of rape exceptions for medical complications and in cases of rape or exceptions for medical complications and in cases of rape or incest. complications and in cases of rape or incest. complications and in cases of rape or incest. The complications and in cases of rape or incest. The clinic complications and in cases of rape or incest. The clinic challenged complications and in cases of rape or incest. The clinic challenged that complications and in cases of rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law saying rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law saying it rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law saying it was rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law saying it was too rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law saying it was too vague rape or incest. The clinic challenged that law saying it was too vague and The clinic challenged that law saying it was too vague and The clinic challenged that law saying it was too vague and caused The clinic challenged that law saying it was too vague and caused confusion The clinic challenged that law saying it was too vague and caused confusion for The clinic challenged that law saying it was too vague and caused confusion for many saying it was too vague and caused confusion for many saying it was too vague and caused confusion for many doctors. caused confusion for many doctors. caused confusion for many doctors. That caused confusion for many doctors. That case caused confusion for many doctors. That case was caused confusion for many doctors. That case was scheduled caused confusion for many doctors. That case was scheduled for doctors. That case was scheduled for doctors. That case was scheduled for trial, doctors. That case was scheduled for trial, until doctors. That case was scheduled for trial, until the doctors. That case was scheduled for trial, until the state doctors. That case was scheduled for trial, until the state asked That case was scheduled for trial, until the state asked That case was scheduled for trial, until the state asked South That case was scheduled for trial, until the state asked South Central That case was scheduled for trial, until the state asked South Central Judge That case was scheduled for trial, until the state asked South Central Judge Bruce trial, until the state asked South Central Judge Bruce trial, until the state asked South Central Judge Bruce Romanick trial, until the state asked South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to trial, until the state asked South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule trial, until the state asked South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right trial, until the state asked South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right away, South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right away, South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right away, saying South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right away, saying since South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right away, saying since the South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic South Central Judge Bruce Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved they Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved they have Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved they have no Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved they have no standing Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a Romanick to rule right away, saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a case saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a case saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a case in saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a case in the saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a case in the state saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a case in the state and saying since the clinic moved they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations by they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations by the they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations by the clinic they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations by the clinic had they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations by the clinic had been they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations by the clinic had been added they have no standing for a case in the state and recommendations by the clinic had been added to in the state and recommendations by the clinic had been added to in the state and recommendations by the clinic had been added to the in the state and recommendations by the clinic had been added to the law. by the clinic had been added to the law. by the clinic had been added to the law. The by the clinic had been added to the law. The clinic by the clinic had been added to the law. The clinic contended by the clinic had been added to the law. The clinic contended there by the clinic had been added to the law. The clinic contended there were the law. The clinic contended there were the law. The clinic contended there were still the law. The clinic contended there were still more the law. The clinic contended there were still more facts the law. The clinic contended there were still more facts to the law. The clinic contended there were still more facts to be the law. The clinic contended there were still more facts to be presented The clinic contended there were still more facts to be presented The clinic contended there were still more facts to be presented at The clinic contended there were still more facts to be presented at trial. still more facts to be presented at trial. still more facts to be presented at trial. In still more facts to be presented at trial. In his still more facts to be presented at trial. In his recent still more facts to be presented at trial. In his recent ruling still more facts to be presented at trial. In his recent ruling Judge at trial. In his recent ruling Judge at trial. In his recent ruling Judge Romanick at trial. In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said at trial. In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this at trial. In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter at trial. In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may be In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may be one In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may be one of In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may be one of the In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most In his recent ruling Judge Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important this Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important this Court Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important this Court issues Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important this Court issues during Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important this Court issues during it Romanick said "this matter may be one of the most important this Court issues during it's be one of the most important this Court issues during it's be one of the most important this Court issues during it's time be one of the most important this Court issues during it's time on be one of the most important this Court issues during it's time on the be one of the most important this Court issues during it's time on the bench." this Court issues during it's time on the bench." this Court issues during it's time on the bench." He this Court issues during it's time on the bench." He stated this Court issues during it's time on the bench." He stated the this Court issues during it's time on the bench." He stated the abortion this Court issues during it's time on the bench." He stated the abortion ban this Court issues during it's time on the bench." He stated the abortion ban laws time on the bench." He stated the abortion ban laws time on the bench." He stated the abortion ban laws were time on the bench." He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional time on the bench." He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because time on the bench." He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because of He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because of He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because of narrow He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because of narrow and He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions He stated the abortion ban laws were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and violated were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and violated a were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and violated a women were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and violated a women's were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and violated a women's right were unconstitutional because of narrow and vague exceptions and violated a women's right to narrow and vague exceptions and violated a women's right to narrow and vague exceptions and violated a women's right to procreative narrow and vague exceptions and violated a women's right to procreative autonomy. violated a women's right to procreative autonomy. violated a women's right to procreative autonomy. However violated a women's right to procreative autonomy. However he violated a women's right to procreative autonomy. However he contended violated a women's right to procreative autonomy. However he contended that violated a women's right to procreative autonomy. However he contended that on procreative autonomy. However he contended that on procreative autonomy. However he contended that on appeal procreative autonomy. However he contended that on appeal his procreative autonomy. However he contended that on appeal his decision procreative autonomy. However he contended that on appeal his decision is procreative autonomy. However he contended that on appeal his decision is given procreative autonomy. However he contended that on appeal his decision is given no However he contended that on appeal his decision is given no However he contended that on appeal his decision is given no respect. appeal his decision is given no respect. appeal his decision is given no respect. The appeal his decision is given no respect. The clinic appeal his decision is given no respect. The clinic says appeal his decision is given no respect. The clinic says it appeal his decision is given no respect. The clinic says it sees appeal his decision is given no respect. The clinic says it sees this appeal his decision is given no respect. The clinic says it sees this as respect. The clinic says it sees this as respect. The clinic says it sees this as a respect. The clinic says it sees this as a victory respect. The clinic says it sees this as a victory but respect. The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have respect. The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no respect. The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans respect. The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on moving The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on moving back The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on moving back to The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on moving back to the The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due The clinic says it sees this as a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to the a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to the strain a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to the strain of a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to the strain of the a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous a victory but have no plans on moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. But moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. But access moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. But access for moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. But access for patients moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. But access for patients is moving back to the state, due to the strain of the previous move. But access for patients is still the strain of the previous move. But access for patients is still the strain of the previous move. But access for patients is still essentially the strain of the previous move. But access for patients is still essentially the the strain of the previous move. But access for patients is still essentially the same. But access for patients is still essentially the same. But access for patients is still essentially the same. "This But access for patients is still essentially the same. "This ruling But access for patients is still essentially the same. "This ruling is But access for patients is still essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental But access for patients is still essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental for essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental for essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental for North essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court essentially the same. "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has struck "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has struck down "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has struck down the "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has struck down the state "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's "This ruling is monumental for North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's entire North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's entire North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's entire ban North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's entire ban on North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This North Dakota. The court has struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means abortion struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means abortion will struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal struck down the state's entire ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal in ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal in ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal in the ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal in the state ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal in the state after ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal in the state after being ban on abortion. This means abortion will soon be legal in the state after being completed abortion will soon be legal in the state after being completed abortion will soon be legal in the state after being completed banned abortion will soon be legal in the state after being completed banned for abortion will soon be legal in the state after being completed banned for over abortion will soon be legal in the state after being completed banned for over a abortion will soon be legal in the state after being completed banned for over a year." the state after being completed banned for over a year." the state after being completed banned for over a year." Attorney the state after being completed banned for over a year." Attorney General the state after being completed banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew the state after being completed banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew Wrigley banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew Wrigley banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew Wrigley said banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's banned for over a year." Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's decision Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's decision Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws in Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws in his Attorney General Drew Wrigley said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws in his analysis said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws in his analysis said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws in his analysis and said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws in his analysis and interpretation said "Judge Romanick's decision reveals flaws in his analysis and interpretation of reveals flaws in his analysis and interpretation of reveals flaws in his analysis and interpretation of controlling reveals flaws in his analysis and interpretation of controlling precedent. and interpretation of controlling precedent. and interpretation of controlling precedent. In and interpretation of controlling precedent. In Bismarck, and interpretation of controlling precedent. In Bismarck, I and interpretation of controlling precedent. In Bismarck, I'm and interpretation of controlling precedent. In Bismarck, I'm Bella and interpretation of controlling precedent. In Bismarck, I'm Bella Kraft controlling precedent. In Bismarck, I'm Bella Kraft

Share your thoughts