Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Avoids A Big Plot Hole With Dead Deetz Family Member

have you ever wondered how Tim Burton skillfully avoids plot holes when bringing back characters in his movies let's take a closer look at the creative solution he employed in Beetlejuice 2 to address the absence of Charles Deets played by Jeffrey Jones in the original 1988 film uh in Beetlejuice death doesn't necessarily mean a character won't appear in subsequent scenes for instance Barbara and Adam maitlin continue as ghosts haunting their home for 125 years after their demise however if Charles Deets were to die in Beetlejuice 2 it wouldn't effectively explain his absence especially if Jeffrey Jones weren't available for the sequel uh to maintain consistency and avoid a plot inconsistency it was essential for Charles deetz's ghost to be present in Beetlejuice too however the challenge was to do this without Jeffrey Jones or a full cast Tim Burton cleverly addressed this issue by revealing that Charles Deets met an unusual demise being eaten by a shark this event left only his upper body intact for the film making it possible for be juice to to feature Charles without the need for Jeffrey Jones or a full recast uh since Charles appears without a face and his voice is altered due to the the shark attack that severed his head and neck the sequel maintains the visual and character of betrayal of the original 1988 films figure as he engages with diaa and other spirits in the afterlife and in conclusion Tim Burton's creative approach to bringing back Charles Deets and Beetle Juice to while avoiding a plot hole and casting dilemma is a testament to his storytelling prowess with that said thanks for watching and stay tuned for more intrig behind the scenes stories and uh notice that you can't do to check another Tempo milk up I don't think this is a big DOD do in noo what he want you to check on my office is a big bu my goodness it's a good tongue and now for a little joke why don't ghosts like rain it dampens their spirits the