keep in mind allegations that this debate was rigged started the moment the betting Markets started implying that Donald Trump was losing the debate now those are betting markets they could be manipulated as well and they fluctuate a lot and yes Kamala has pulled ahead in the betting markets uh but some of the first rumors that we heard were that kamla Harris was wearing an earpiece and she was being fed information about what to say or zingers to say uh potentially even wearing navo earrings that had like a little speaker on them we're going to get into this whistleblower complaint here but that's major high risk you lose one of those they fall down and it's just like blatant evidence of cheating uh it would be really bad I don't think that's worth the risk I think she had plenty of debate prep and Donald Trump just didn't prep as well as he should have but let's listen to these new whistleblower allegations to see if there's any potential credibility here and what we should pay attention to there is now a serious allegation circulating that could totally be fake news but we need to address it there's an allegation now circulating that somebody claiming to be an ABC whistleblower is going to quote before the weekend release a signed affidavit to allege that the Harris campaign received or helped to draft the policy questions and debate questions that were asked pass on the debate between Trump and Harris and that Harris was promised not to be F checked if she went on the ABC debate we have a lot to unpack here so let's go ahead and start with where this speculation and rumor is coming from and then I'm going to give you my opinion on all of this keep in mind it is coupon code expiration day it actually expires in like 2 hours because we're doing for some reason we decided to do a 600 p.m and California time for it over at meetkevin.com you know the drill you get lifetime access you pay once you get to find out my multi-million dollar trade soft Landing or recession it's not a short it's not a short it's actually a long position it's not a short uh and it's also not a bet against the q's for example or any individual stock uh that's why I think it can do well uh when uh when and if we have a recession I think it'll do extremely well and if we don't have a recession I also think it'll do well but obviously there are ways it could do poorly as well and if you want to sort of watch my uh positions change over time and discuss them with the course members you pay once you get lifetime access forever and you're guaranteed to get the lowest price so as these sales expire the price just goes up over time all right so Bill anman quote tweeted this and this is where I saw it Bill Amman tweeted if this turns out to be true this is a serious breach of journalistic ethic eics and a death blow to the ABC Network reputation so at least bill lman is acknowledging that it could potentially not be true which that is something we have to consider at this point is this this could be made up and it could just be disinformation that's being used to try to romote the Trump campaign right now Rita here replies and says um the way moderators conducted the debate was a serious breach and death blow to ABC's reputation okay so obviously you know even since debate night I was commenting on Wow and I was tweeting this too I was tweeting hey why does it seem like Trump has gotten fact check four or five times here now In fairness some of the stuff that Trump was getting fact checked on he should have been fact checked on and some of the things he should not have been fact check on so some of the fact checks were wrong and some of them were accurate but kamla Harris when she made a misstatement like for example uh saying that Donald Trump suggested uh anti semites were very fine people which we know this because you should look up the quote Trump said there's some people in the crowd who are very fine and then there are others who are very evil right look up the quote yourself look at the context there was no fact check of KLA Harris okay we we called that out immediately when it happened so we've we all saw the same debate we knew this was likely to be a three And1 there's a reason why I tweeted Trump should have prepared more he knew this was going to be a three vers one debate but didn't come as prepared as he should have been that led KLA Harris land many attacks you know I also argue that Taylor Swift is so good at branding we all know she hates Trump by endorsing Harris after the debate Swift implies she made her decision during the debate and then I wrote yeah right she was always for Harris but brilliant branding move implying she was waiting for the debate to make up her mind and therefore you'd be smart to make up your mind after the debate too I love Taylor Swift but I called BS on that one okay 57 minutes into debate Trump has not talked about the future ABC needed to stay neutral they have not they fact check Trump uh and they stayed on hard for Trump topics longer right Harris is doing well not perfect but respectable she she did very well uh and uh wow ABC has fact checked Trump at least three to four times now zero fact checks by ABC for Harris again I I didn't have too many fact checks I will say for Harris either but there were definitely a few opportunities to fact check her and I called him out anytime I saw him I'm like I called him out I'm like no that's wrong that's basic you saw me you saw me cover this live uh there were more opportunities to fact check Trump but the fact that she got zero fact checks uh and and he got five four to five uh is helping lead to the speculation that okay what kind of rigging was going on here now the allegation apparently and this is where we have to to really question the source of this keep in mind like I don't like this release I I think this is this is kind of it's it potentially is true but uh it's also potentially total bull crap I hate how they're setting this up so first of all it's black insurrectionist I follow back true Patriots is the account okay so so so far the source is a little Looney already uh and when you scroll through their profile most of their tweets or posts since it's now on X are basically just all prot Trump uh here is how the left honors 911 and you know implying more terrorism comes from Trump uh first it was dos attacks now the mail you know basically everything about this person's channel is doing whatever Trump wants like it almost sounds like an ult for Trump will you join me in calling phone number 202225 27777 whatever this is the number for speaker Johnson please tell him to shut the government down unless the save Act is passed we need every single person who believes in Fair elections to show them please join them it's it's already illegal uh to vote an election if you're not a documented citizen obviously the save Act is designed to strengthen some of the prosecution here but the account is certainly not an unbiased Source right this is clearly a trump uh uh a prot trump account it may even be a trump campaign account nonetheless they are now staking their account reputation on the following I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate okay now first of all an affidavit doesn't necessarily mean anything an affidavit doesn't I mean what it is it's it's a sworn statement but anybody can make a sworn statement if you went to you know the cameraman at ABC and you're like hey 500 Grand to you or to your wife so nobody sees or whatever I need you to sign a sworn statement that you swear you know something it's still not proof right like proof would be here's an email from ABC to the comma campaign I'm just making an example of what proof would be obviously there could be other forms of proof recordings or whatever a sworn affidavit is going to be on the weaker end of evidence actually a sworn affidavit really isn't evidence at all uh as Judge Judy could say or would likely say is he a say even though it's sworn it could be complete BS I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of The Whistleblower okay so if there's an attorney of The Whistleblower is there going to be a lawsuit because if there's going to be a lawsuit then there'll be evidence and then we can actually go through it the affidavit States how the Harris campaign was given sample question okay you can't even have grammar flow here correctly which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of factchecking Donald Trump and that she would not be fact checked well it is true that she was not fact checked and it is true that Donald Trump was fact check and we know ABC leans left this is not evidence that ABC did release questions nor is it evidence that ABC gave assurances that there would be factchecking of trump accordingly the affidavit States several other factors that were built into the debate to give kamla a significant Advantage I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the Whistleblower and the other information that could dox The Whistleblower I will release the affidavit I I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out okay so now if we have an anonymous affidavit and no evidence we really have nothing this could be complete fugazi it could literally be Donald Trump that is the ABC whistleblower you know I was there that night and it's literally Donald Trump so I take this with a substantial grain of salt uh would now but I will say would it surprise me that you know maybe verbally the co the Harris campaign was given a promise not to be fact checked no it wouldn't surprise me uh and would it surprise me that Harris Camp had some of the questions beforehand no but then again let's be real do we really think that either campaign didn't know these things would come up I mean think about the flow of the campaign I mean I certainly didn't have any answers beforehand and I knew Trump was going to get asked about abortion and I knew he was going to f it up that not a hard prediction to make it's not a hard prediction at all in fact to make it was actually pretty freaking obvious that Trump was going to get hit on abortion and he was going to screw it up the flow of the debate was intro intro Trump tariffs after Trump tariffs and some parts about the economy we get into China and Taiwan and then straight into abortion all of these are super predictable topics we get into IVF we get uh into Afghanistan we get into uh liability for presidents via the Supreme Court we get into j6 none of this was a surprise there was not a single surprise topic here you could have prepared for all of this fracking oil climate change defund the police come on I could have written these questions you could have written these questions none of these questions were a surprise Trump could have been substantially more prepared and he chose not to be that's on him I I think it may have been an ego thing but honestly this debate is just going to blow over and we're still going to have a tight elction here now Donald Trump apparently is now also coming out suggesting that not only should there be no tax on tips but there should also be no tax on overtime pay now boy that would be really interesting because overtime pay is usually time and a half to double time pay right you work more than eight hours you usually get time and a half you work more than 12 hours in a shift you get double time double pay dude if you didn't get paid tax like if there was no tax on overtime pay that would literally I mean think about this for a moment let's say you make uh 30 bucks an hour okay 30 bucks an hour and on overtime you make $45 an hour well divide that by your tax rate so you know I don't know uh one minus your tax rate call it 67% uh and we're going to divide it by that saying you pay 33% of taxes that means ordinarily you would have to make about $67 uh to be left with $45 after so in other words if you were working time and a half and that extra time was not taxed it would be like working for $67 an hour at time and a half so normally your wage is $30 an hour time and a half not taxed would be like $67 an hour double time not taxed would actually be like 3x pay and it make a lot of people want to work overtime that's what D sure so interesting can any of these presidential plans from Harris or Trump actually really pass well they' really need to sweep and they need to have some form of majority I think there's a higher likelihood of Republicans controlling the house and the Senate just because of where the dynamic set right now which seats are up for grabs seats that Democrats might not hold on to or Republicans might win uh but it's it's a tossup right now in terms of who's going to win the election so you're probably going to have a divided uh government and you're probably going to be in a situation where a lot of these big plans don't go through anyway but we'll see certainly not going to be like 2008 where you had 60 votes uh in the senate for Democrats and you're able to to basically have a filibuster proof majority and you can slam dunk whatever you want like the Affordable Care Act or otherwise you know Obamacare we'll see either way I saw this news wanted to cover it we got a coupon code expiring in 2 hours thank you so much for watching we'll see you in the next one go to meet kevin.com to learn more if you have questions or for some reason you missed the coupon whatever email us at staff atme kevin.com thanks bye why not advertise these things that you told us here I feel like nobody else knows about this we'll we'll try a little advertising and see how it goes congratulations you have done so much people love you people look up to you Kevin PA there financial analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get your take even though I'm a licensed financial adviser licensed real estate broker and becoming a stock broker this video is not personalized advice for you it is not tax legal or otherwise personalized advice tailor to you this video provides generalized perspective information and commentary any thirdparty content I show shall not be deemed endorsed by me this video is not and shall never be deemed reasonably sufficient information for the purposes of evaluating a security or investment decision any link or promoted products are either paid affiliations or products or Services we may benefit from I also personally operate an actively managed ETF I may personally hold or otherwise hold long or short positions in various Securities potentially including those mentioned in this video however I have no relationship to any issuer other than house Haack nor am I presently acting as a market maker make sure if you're considering investing in house Haack to always read the PPM at house.com