>>DION: SENATOR TINA SMITH IS
LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 >>DION: SENATOR TINA SMITH IS
LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR >>DION: SENATOR TINA SMITH IS
LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD >>DION: SENATOR TINA SMITH IS
LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. >>DION: SENATOR TINA SMITH IS
LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S >>DION: SENATOR TINA SMITH IS
LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED >>DION: SENATOR TINA SMITH IS
LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW LOOKING TO REPEAL A 150 YEAR
OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED TO OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED TO LIMIT OLD LAW. IT'S CALLED THE
COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO ABORTION COMSTOCK ACT, AND RIGHT NOW IT
COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE. COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE. COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH JOINED COULD BE USED TO LIMIT ACCESS
TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH TO ABORTION NATIONWIDE.
SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH SENATOR SMITH JOINED MINNESOTA
ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON
AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM AS SHE HIGHLIGHTED HER PUSH TO
REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS. REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS. REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS REPEAL IT.. OUR STATE CAPITOL
REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO PROHIBIT REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE REPORTER QUINN GORHAM REPORTS.
THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US
POSTAL THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US
POSTAL SERVICE THE COMSTOCK ACT WAS ORIGINALLY
PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US
POSTAL SERVICE FROM PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US
POSTAL SERVICE FROM PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US
POSTAL SERVICE FROM
DISTRIBUTING PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US
POSTAL SERVICE FROM
DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" PASSED TO PROHIBIT THE US
POSTAL SERVICE FROM
DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS. POSTAL SERVICE FROM
DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS. POSTAL SERVICE FROM
DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, POSTAL SERVICE FROM
DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, ACCORDING POSTAL SERVICE FROM
DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG KEITH DISTRIBUTING "OBSCENE" ITEMS.
NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON, NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON, NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW ISN'T NOWADAYS, ACCORDING TO
MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW ISN'T REALLY MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW ISN'T REALLY MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW ISN'T REALLY
ENFORCED... MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW ISN'T REALLY
ENFORCED... BUT MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW ISN'T REALLY
ENFORCED... BUT A MINNESOTA AG KEITH ELLISON,
THE LAW ISN'T REALLY
ENFORCED... BUT A SUPREME THE LAW ISN'T REALLY
ENFORCED... BUT A SUPREME ENFORCED... BUT A SUPREME ENFORCED... BUT A SUPREME
JOINED ENFORCED... BUT A SUPREME
JOINED FORCES ENFORCED... BUT A SUPREME
JOINED FORCES FRIDAY ENFORCED... BUT A SUPREME
JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT JOINED FORCES FRIDAY TO
HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS HIGHLIGHT A PUSH TO REPEAL THE
COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT COMSTOCK ACT BEFORE THAT CAN
HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL TO HAPPEN. SMITH SAYS SHE'S
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE LAW. INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE LAW. CURRENTLY, INTRODUCING LEGISLATION AT THE
NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN NATION'S CAPITOL TO OVERTURN
THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO THE LAW. CURRENTLY, COURT
PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN THE PRECEDENT IN MINNESOTA
PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN THE STATE PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN THE STATE PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT PROTECTS THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE ABORTION IN THE STATE
CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES CONSTITUTION, A PRECEDENT THAT
WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING WON'T CHANGE UNLESS THE STATE
SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% OF SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS SUPREME COURT OVERRIDES THAT
PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED WITH PRECEDENT. BUT ACCORDING TO
SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING SMITH, 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE
PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, PERFORMED WITH MEDICATION
THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS THAT'S MAILED, MAKING THE
COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR COMSTOCK ACT, A FEDERAL LAW, A
THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK ACT THREAT TO ABORTION ACCESS EVEN
IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE IN MINNESOTA. THE SENATOR SAID
THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER TO THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER TO BAN THE COMSTOCK ACT WOULD
EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER TO BAN MOST EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER TO BAN MOST EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EFFECTIVELY GIVE THE PRESIDENT
THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS THE POWER TO BAN MOST
ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD ABORTIONS THROUGH EXECUTIVE
ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO ORDER. "DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID
REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND REPEATEDLY THAT HE WOULD BAN
ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN ABORTION THAT HE WANTS TO LEAD
THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT THE CHARGE TO DO THAT, AND WE
SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG SHOULD BELIEVE HIM WHEN HE
TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS TELLS US THAT THAT'S WHAT HE
INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING INTENDS TO DO." AG ELLISON
SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD SAYS AN EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH A CLAUSE PROTECTING THE
RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, RIGHT TO ABORTION WOULD GIVE
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AN
EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN EXTRA LAYER OF PROTECTION, BUT
FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL FEDERAL LAW STILL SUPERSEDES
THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, THE STATE. OF COURSE EVEN IF
THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS THE BILL HAD FULL DEMOCRATIC
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED SUPPORT IN THE SENATE, IT
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE. WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE. WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS A
REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING REPUBLICAN- CONTROLLED HOUSE.
SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING THE SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING THE SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO SMITH HAD NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US THAT MATTER, SAYING THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED TO TAKE
BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS. BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS. BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING IN BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING IN ST. BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, BACK CONTROL OF THE US HOUSE
FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M
QUINN FOR HIS LEGISLATION TO PASS.
REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M
QUINN GORHAM. REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M
QUINN GORHAM. REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M
QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M
QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M
QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT REPORTING IN ST. PAUL, I'M
QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT QUINN GORHAM.
>>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP >>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP >>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE >>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK >>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT >>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING >>DION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A CASE ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A CASE IN ALITO AND THOMAS BROUGHT UP
THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A CASE IN MARCH. THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A CASE IN MARCH. THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A CASE IN MARCH.
>>STACY: THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A CASE IN MARCH.
>>STACY: HEALTH THE COMSTOCK ACT DURING ORAL
ARGUMENTS FOR A CASE IN MARCH.
>>STACY: HEALTH OFFICIALS