Young Thug Trial Fani Willis OFFICE WANTS MOUNK TOUNK IN PRISON

by contradiction I won't get all into all of that but um when on Cross examination oh judge oh appreciate it all right I'm gonna give you your would you get that documents back could you imagine if that would have been Glenville bro today Miss Love impatience all of that let's go 41104 um which specifically deals with um the court handling the admissibility of evidence and the Court's determination of it um 24114 e um expressly says that this code section shall not limit the right of a party to introduce uh before the jury evidence relevant to weight or credibility um and so to the extent that um part of our evidence and it doesn't you know speak to the weight of the evidence of the murder but we believe that it substantiates and it corroborates our assertion via the over acts that we have listed that there is this conspiracy and that there are uh efforts that are continually made by members of YSL to support uh and protect one another and to advance the dominance and notoriety of the gang through acts of violence and assault all right well I do not think 104 has any bearing whatsoever on whether y'all can admit it before the jury okay see okay that takes care of that one all right do you do you have any can you look if you haven't yet for any case law that deals with kind of a similar set of facts Mr a is shaking his head yes he is can look for that oh that is we definitely can I was just trying to make sure that I um fully got what the court was saying so in in saying the same set of facts is of course we can as to you know somebody jumping somebody well I mean yeah ideally if you could get that that would be great but no it doesn't have to be that specific but something that deals with gangs in or Rico because what I hear you saying or what I think I understand you to be saying is that part of why this is intrinsic is because it's necessary to give a full story of how YSL is this ongoing criminal Enterprise that uses violence to protect their members is am I understanding you correctly you are and thir is dominance and and in support of that I also say that each of the members of YSL llot epinger McMullen Ryan and Fleetwood had all um I believe all of them had brought in been brought in from prison for yso related offenses that they had been convicted of uh epinger had um been sentenced to prison uh off of a probation revocation for an armed robbery after he shot officer Rogers that was a YSL related incident um Mr Fleetwood had been brought in from prison uh after shooting at Milton Howard who at the time was driving wife and Luchi vehicle with tenant windows so the argument obviously could be made he didn't know it was um Mr Howard he knew it was an Ops car so all these people are all incarcerated because of wiel related offenses and then you put them all in the same little area and they are once more acting as one single bullet against somebody they believe is a threat but I can and we will look for uh a case on all fours with this particular set of circumstances YouTube Just purged and we lost 200 subscribers so when celebration of us losing 200 subscribers write this word when this hits 190,000 Subs come to the last video and write this word don't tell nobody so particularly um a witness may be impeached um by contradiction in several ways um close questioning to elicit concessions of errors and testimony during direct um questioning a witness about the substance or implications of evidence already produced during the case to suggest contradictions confronting the witness with his home her own contradictory prior statements or calling another witness or introducing other extrinsic contradicting evidence generally speaking the admission of extrinsic evidence for contradiction um impeachment is restricted to non-collateral matters so that evidence that impeaches um by contradiction and is not collateral can be both substantively admissible as well as admissible for its impeachment value and that is coming from bailor be l r versus hanlin h a n l n 1 199 F RB uh 553 and then the parenthetical is surveying um numerous commentaries um judge with respect to Mr Sledge the reason that I um began my statements to the court about what it is that he said and um will then go into what his lawyer said when I asked his lawyer about um plea negotiations on the heels of Mr Sledge not just saying he was told he could get up and tell his truth but on cross-examination he was asked repeatedly um through through the use of um allowable leading questions these weren't your words you didn't write it you didn't understand it you didn't know what you were signing you felt like you could come in here and tell your truth you signed it regardless I'm not directly quoting but essentially even though it wasn't true you signed it and things of that nature were elicited during cross um you signed it because you wanted to get out to go see your sick mom things like that you were in Fon County blue that's the only reason you sign it these aren't your words the state these are only the state's words so all of those questions were intended to um attack The credibility of the veracity of the statement that Mr Sledge made on December 28 2022 when he signed the plea agreement and Mr Sledge acquiesced to all of those essentially asserting through his um sort of app ation and and and and running back and and um you know pulling back my truth I don't understand I don't recall I don't remember saying that that isn't true um and he pointing out at the state's request the factual acknowledgements that he now asserts were inaccurate or not completely true he allowed um himself in the cross-examining attorney to in front of the jury completely question or to um undermine The credibility of the statement that he made and his own credibility at the time that he made the statement so as the court has already instructed the jury that the inconsistent statements of a witness are also substantive evidence that may be considered against other um other persons on can the court hear me okay yeah all right so as the court has already instructed the jury that um it can now consider that statement as substan of evidence what we've seen is an attempt by the defense to destroy um the jury's Faith In The credibility or veracity of that statement made by Mr Sledge on December 28 2022 so when um questions were posed to his attorney regarding Mr sledge's understanding of those acknowledgements and sentencing agreements um on the one hand after he made clear um that though he's a friend of both sides he's a defense attorney through and through Mr uh right though he did clear it up he seemed to um his his answers on cross- examination there were some things that were not true there were some things we didn't agree to he was kind of vague with it and it took belaboring Point by point for him to even acknowledge hey number uh three number eight these are the only two anybody took issue with so at this point your honor I believe that the iterations that were presented to Mr Wright and to his client per his words um are important because it is further evidence that corroborates um Mr sledge's understanding of and his understanding of the final ple agreement that is 1 as and 444 and his ability to effectively um engage in and uh take have an active hand in that final document that uh he signed on December 28 2022 it points not only it it demonstrates not only the inconsistencies of Mr sleder's testimony but his outright perjury regarding um his purported lack of ability to have any stay in what that final document um asserted that he signed it is um illustrative of the fact that he actually did um have the ability to tell the state what he felt wasn't true and what parts he wanted changed um and I think that um it of our position is that it is relevant in in showing or allowing the jury to judge The credibility of statements Mr Sledge has made on the stand versus The credibility of the statement that he made on December 28th 2022 um the statute that I cited earlier it it it substantiates our position that the representations that Mr Sledge um made under oath on December 28 2022 um were part of a a long and detailed um negotiation and refinement that Mr Sledge himself took part in um as we I think at this point 24114 might become relevant that's the one I brought earlier that didn't have any bearing on what we were talking about but in as much as um 24 uh1 104 speaks to the C- session not limiting the right of a party to introduce before the jury evidence relevant to weight or credibility we believe that um this particular evidence allows the jury it is pertinent evidence that they should be allowed to see to understand fully what was put before Mr Sledge what he did dispute what he did not dispute and what he so that they can compare it with what he finally agreed to and make a better determination about the truth of the statements he made on December 2018 after that which I believe was for 53 but I'll check my notes to ensure that that's the case so in as much as number one he's saying okay there's no caveat there's no oh he we needs okay so number two um obviously Mr Sledge agreed to number two um but there is an additional they formed about three years before peanut was shot him offering up that kind of information Mr Sledge offering up that kind of information is nowhere in there is he asserting um it's a record label all right well nowhere in his factual acknowledgement on number two is it asserted what YSL is it just says defendant has been a member Andor associate of YSL since blank right so he wouldn't need to say and by the way it's not a gang I agree with that also but in number one where we say what it is we don't use the word game we say something we we we use specific language that he's perfectly okay with and then in number two he makes no effort to you know qualify anything as he did on the stand multiple times okay well as we all know the case law holds that it's actually not illegal to be a member of a criminal street gang it's only illegal to commit crimes and furtherance of well toit crimes period and then it makes it a gang violation to commit crimes and furtherance and that's why number one say right and so I mean number one is whatever number one is but you know that they that number two says oh by the way it was about three years before peanut was shot is that he's offering information and I'm going to defer whatever the Court's ruling is but it's that he's offering additional information he's he's comfortable enough to say that's he's I think that is a okay I think it it was about three years beforehand so it must have been about 2012 okay okay okay so three number three um didn't we read that into the record we did we read the response Mr Wright gave okay and I I believe we did read the I believe we read as well the portion of 452 that was number three and then the final I I think we read three number threes into the record just so that the court is heing what I believe is a full truth we read not just that but I asked him to read what he responded to and then how we changed it for him we read number at least the final version of number three many many many times so number four um oh back on the email by Mr Wright okay we never read that in right so I'll I'll remind the court that we approached about number four there were obvious problems with number four that were inadmissible we were told to stay away from number four the state was told away from number four told to stay away from number four for obvious reasons there's all sorts of speculation in there and now after being told to stay away from it and we were told to stay away from it and we did not address it during cross-examination now after Witnesses have testified the state's seeking to admit a document that has number four in it and it's just I mean I I don't know what we're doing okay um number five is not even relevant right you um as it if I may just circle back briefly as it relates to number four there was an objection to it we did we followed the course instruction we did not ask him about it um and when the the issue that I had with number um four not being addressed here is I don't it more importantly I don't know how an assertion that the witness did not adopt be is is prejudicial when he is not he he denies it and we change it we take it out that he was planning he had personal knowledge that they were planning that is powerful because it is a material fact that he does have personal knowledge they were planning it that's ex judge that's the point that I'm making that he says I did not know that the fact that something that even saying I did not know that is sort of like or that's not true it's true but I didn't know it no he's saying that's not true he is saying no he's not he's saying I don't know I think maybe XYZ that is not coming in that's the ultimate one that he signed but showing yes it is it is I know showing that he was untruthful and and letting the judge letting the jury decide why you telling stories about that about seeing a prior version We believe is strong evidence that allows them to judge his credibility why he's saying what he's saying any bias he may or may not have and help them to determine the truth of which statement they should believe so we would ask that the court um I don't know five its prior ruling minuto revive the ruling that the court made denied let's move on you can kind of tell that Whitaker doesn't like love at all but you could tell Whitaker likes to micromanage she basically told Miss love to get in some evidence that was supposed to be there by Friday love ended up saying can I get it to him by Monday now you could say well she was a an attorney before and so she should know certain things and she would know like all right that's a little hard to do so doing it at this time is more feasible all right cool but it doesn't account for this why is it that whenever she has to talk to Miss love about her lack of doing stuff it's always with an annoyed voice and then this level do yeah all right and then I'll give a damn and do it all over again eventually you're going to have to say miss judge pardon me the honorable Judge Whitaker you're GNA have to say that can't come in because I told you to do it at this time and you didn't get it done so you know what I'm going to need you to do I'm going to need you to pack it the hell up and we're not going to bring that in that has to eventually happen because at the end of the day y'all should already had this stuff all this stuff should already be suned over all of this crap could have been taken care of while we were doing jury selection ever cross anybody's mind then on top of that ad miss her falling and stuff she still ain't really ruled on the little ride stuff and everybody wondering why Young Thug basically I moved up and stuff like that well according to miss syia she said that Lil Rod got caught with Contraband and that's why Young Thug got moved up to where he was what they were trying to do what Miss love was trying to do was basically bring in the murder of some guy that L rod and and and God I can't think of the nigga's name it's another cat on there uh BB yeah and uh some with bris and stuff like that b basically a whole bunch of goddamn Knuckleheads and trying to say that this is all YSL Associates doing something on behalf of YSL even know L Rod really ain't YSL at all young th don't even know this dude but that's a whole another story for a whole another day so you got that crap coming in and what what it's supposed to do and miss love knows this crap L Rod is on an appeal but what it's supposed to do is essentially make sure all this crap is tied back to Young Thug and make Young Thug look bad because once they hear that little Rod is a murderer who who's getting a plead I mean who's trying to basically appeal it fight it all over again he's sitting next to who little Jeff Jeffrey Young Thug King Slime so he's sitting there with a killer y'all don't think y'all do y'all do then on top of that bro she can't let this [ __ ] go with M I think it's because when he said you don't intimidate me you don't talk to me like you talk to your child and all that crap and she start trying to be nice to him and he start being nice to her and then at the end he turned on her and came back and apologized yeah I think that [ __ ] still sticks in her CW she essentially tried to say that he was a liar that they never I'm not saying she said this but this is you can gather the essence of it that nah what we did basically was ethical and he had a chance to turn stuff around and he decided not to and on top of that we were never really going to discuss it and all this crap and everything like that but it's kind of crazy how under oath his lawyer even said that and his lawyer who knew you for over 13 years so are you saying that his Advocate is a liar Miss love all right we'll hold on to that one then you have more phone calls and all of that crap that exists and I'm listening to all this [ __ ] and it's like oh some dude had on um something that was OTS only the Slime and basically had a gun I'm sorry but I could have sworn Georgia is definitely a prun state matter of fact you don't even need to be trained because you have what's called constitutional carry unless you forgot that crap is love but I'm pretty sure you didn't so we gonna see if L Rod's murder conviction can actually be brought up talking about case law case law case law on that crap and we'll see bro because at the end of the day what they're going to attempt to do if it's brought in let me let me make sure I put this out there before y'all Jump and Go no wait wait wait the judge has not ruled on it yet all right so make sure I I let y'all know we don't have a ruling a ruling on this rment that should be a word right rment anyways basically there's three photos that they're trying to bring in and three photos going to have to deal with autopsy and all that crap so we already know if they turn around and bring in those photos that's going to turn their stomachs upside down just is what it is so we'll see bro I don't I don't know how how this all how this [ __ ] is really going to play out because even then they had an argument about statal limitations and it stuff could actually be brought in as far as intrinsic uh acts outside of the goddamn indictment and stuff then it was funny because we had um we had some dude named un that was giving advice to I can't remember who his name was but then they were even arguing that and to me it just sounded like little buddy was basically say hey man I'm about to probably have to go to jail they got a warrant and he like man just lay low stack your bread up and get ready basically for the rumble which I mean that's what it is save your money you don't want to court appointed attorney so there's that bro today Miss love triy to bring in some [ __ ] the judge said no and literally Miss love tried to bring it in again 5 minutes later and just like you mean the stuff I told you about 5 minutes later it's still going to be a no and I'm like I thought back to jville to gladville like just stop just stop when you lose win bad or indifferent good bad or indiff just stop oh no you don't like when my are you do not like when you don't get your way just y'all remember that [ __ ] so yeah man just Godly oh miss love she is consistent persistent and such a petulent goddamn loser it is sad just stop but we'll see what happens tomorrow um what the hell detective Thorp is GNA be coming in sometime this week probably Friday and holy hell this is the cop we want I get Dennis I get Chapstick I get gther um the other [ __ ] belt that monkey ass who else oh can't think of his name the first 48 Dennis I mean not Dennis but whatever the hell his name is the one I caught lying on and said remember his ass so you had all of them but Thorp was the baldheaded [ __ ] that was in there doing all the yelling and cussing and all of that stuff so he probably going to be on the stand for about three days and I swear to you Brian steel if I got send a million and a half a million and a half dollars to you which I don't have by the way so miss love if you're watching this pay attention I don't have a million dollars I don't know where the hell I can get a million dollars at but I will say this please oh please let Keith Adams goddamn cross Thorp we need more Adams did you not see how he barbecu grilled the infinity man we'll be going over that on I want to say Saturday but um Sunday either Saturday or Sunday I'll let y'all pick it we G to go ahead and destroy a so-called YSL member I'm I'm sick of this dude running his goddamn mouth because it's just it's it's it's effing with me and I got to do something because if I don't do something I'm GNA lose my mind but other than that bro y'all let me know what y'all thought of today bro whether y'all thought about this Whitaker falling and then apologizing for it afterwards and stuff like that that was classy I'll give her that or basically Harvey and love getting into it I ain't gon to lie they could box and I'mma take Miss love I'll take Miss love over everybody except Keith Adams mck andad Matthews and Shar I think I think Matt Sharp probably grew up with some black people I think Matt shark grew up in like a mixed neighborhood where he had black friends growing up I just I just get that vibe that I get a vibe that he grew up around a lot of black people so you got Adams you got Matthews and you got sh everybody else I think they'll get the hell beat out of them all the ladies all the goddamn ladies on the defense nah hell no I'm Sorry Miss love that is a a a tall thick woman and I think never mind I'm not boy I'm G to get in trouble y' y'all gonna get me in trouble y I'm about to say some [ __ ] boy CU anyways if you need to contact me you need to holl at me and stuff like that holl at me on Twitter don't holl at me on Instagrams no more [ __ ] Instagram I kept trying to next them did you catch that video