Dr. Judy Wood tells Richard Syrett the "planes" involved image manipulation so were the planes a hologram uh I think it was some kind of uh image thing and a lot of people have done you know more research into that what was actually involved was some Andrew Johnson says "planes" involved image projection type of image projection technology and I know that you've probably done more research in that area cuz I know you've been talking to Mark I found companies Companies in Directed Energy Professionals Society specialize in holography, DEW, psyops, and investigated 9/11 that specialize in Holograms or holography all members of the directed energy professional Society alongside boo Allen Hamilton locked Boeing what about you know saic or ar they all work on Sops they all work on psychological operations directed energy Holograms lasers all things that you would see in a sci-fi film it's actually being worked on and these are the same people that investigated 911 they were paid hired by nist yeah well just to mention you when you did the film you covered a lot of the contractors who were involved in those type of Technologies you know after the film it was something that I got a bit more engrossed with was I wanted something tangible how this is done it's very secret and you had people trying to debunk what was in the film saying you can't project a hologram Into Thin Air that was one of my main missions to just keep searching to try and prove this technology exists so anyway March this year that actually Mark Conlon goes over Navy patent on ghost volumetric image decoy plasma projection technology came across a patent I think it was published in 6th of February 2020 actually I think it may have been applied for uh in 2018 that's around when your film right yeah but the actual publishing of this document that I found was very very it ticked a lot of boxes for what we were talking about in the film it is a system method for a laser induced plasma infrared homing missile counter measure essentially what it is it's a device that can be connected or attached to an aircraft and if that aircraft is going to be seed out by a missile can project multiple aircrafts into space and they are threedimensional volumetric image of an object which is like a ghost image that's what they use in this uh document we had roastman Marcus Icke and Dr. Stefan Grossmann article on Ghost Gun UA175 published an article that's on my website called UA 175 ghost gun and he talks about a military Black Op project using term ghost and so I think it's very interesting this patent you found uses the same term yeah that's the term they use yeah do you have the document there with you I do yeah yeah yeah this is what really struck me because when you read the documents you know some of the things they describe you know it ticks every box of what we have spoken about for a long time it is possible to generate a 2d or 3D volumetric image in space it says in one potential embodiment a laser system would be mounted on the back of an air vehicle such that the beam can be red using Optics and mirrors to generate a large ghost image in space this ghost would appear to detract homing missile away from a tangible air vehicle in the second embodiment there can burn multiple laser systems mounted on the back of the air vehicle with each laser system generating a ghost image such that there would appear to be multiple air vehicles I I have to say Chris this Richard Hall's original Radar analysis showing 2 different flight paths takes me back to Richard's very very first radar analysis of FL 175 it became a project to compare all of those videos and ask the question were they all showing a consistent plane path sorry second update when he had the two tracks of two different flight paths I actually looked at two separate radar paths one of them was from the military known as the radz system which was positioned much further away than the domestic radar system and I commented on the fact that there seemed to be a discrepancy so the the two radar paths were actually the same they were going in the same direction the same speed uh but they were they were many many meters apart running in parallel they explained that a way that that could have been to do with the razor calibrations and and things different with the military and sort of Civilian apparently if your radar equipment is a long distance away from the thing that you're observing you get a fixed offset error so this was just an error in the equipment once you take out that error the two paths were the same but Richard originally thought that there was something traveling alongside projecting the plane all right and I thought well was one of them being used to project an image that was producing the other one perhaps um I wasn't sure now that to me Military radar path is either an calibration error or possibly a drone aircraft flying alongside the 2nd "plane" becomes plausible again you're saying that this patent supports that first idea that one plane could be projecting stealth image and and as the document says that you just read a three-dimensional volume metric object of a ghost aircraft yes yes which you know depending on how we look at it you At LEAST 3 mystery planes flying around 2nd "plane" did have that other aircraft that was traveling alongside that's captured in a number of videos Ms note there were at least three mystery planes flying alongside the alleged flight 175 plane one located southeast of the WTC and two at the Northwest at different elevations rare footage shows a mystery Mystery object flying alongside 2nd "plane" at rapid speed object object flying near the second quote plane which was going 587 mph did you see that yeah oh my God why why he did that e Naudet footage shows right wing disappearing and reappearing in one of those clips the wing actually dis the wing disappears at some point and that could be due to some sort of strobing effect the knotted footage shows the right wing missing and suddenly reappearing 3 videos synced showing right wing disappear there are also a dozen videos showing the rightwing disappear at the exact same time and place thus ruling out camera artifacts video compression and CGI Les Sweeting said he saw a rocket but when we came down here I see a rocket go into this one just watch the rocket drive straight into the center Photographs show disappearing wing and impossible crash physics even photographs not just screenshots from videos show disappearing wings and impossible crash Dynamics this further rules Out video art effects when light Dr. Judy Wood questions the optics on 9/11 doesn't do what you think it's supposed to do you start wondering about what's happening with the Optics