Alright Alright Alright What's up DNC? Alright y'all remember this big old book from before, when Colorado Governor Jerry Poland ripped
the page out of it. This is project 2025, the Republican blueprint for a second Trump term. It is a Yeah, yeah BOOOOO. It is
a real document that you can read for yourself at Kamala Harris dot
com, forward slash project 2025. You ever seen a document that could kill a
small animal and democracy at the same time? You know how, when you download an app and there
are hundreds of pages there that you don't read, it's just the terms and conditions,
and you just click agree, right? Well, these are the terms and conditions of a
second Trump presidency. You vote for him. You vote for all of this. Let's take a look. All right, we got Matt here with
us tonight. Is Matt here. Hey, there. He is Matt. How are you, sir? All right, Matt, now, Matt, I understand
that you work as an AV tech in Nevada. Oh, I don't know if we can
hear Matt. Can we hear Matt? So who's gonna fix it. Keep speaking, Matt, so we can hear you.
I guess we're going to move on from Matt. And this is Becky. Becky, can we hear you? Hi Kenan and yeah great to be hear. Thank you. All right, good. now, Becky, you're married, correct? I am me and
my wife have been together for about eight years. Oh, that's amazing. Very, very cute. Thanks But I have got some bad news for you I hate that on page 584, Project 2025, calls for the
elimination of protections for LGBTQ plus Americans.
(Crowd Booing) He said on page 584, Project 2025 calls for the elimination
of protections of LGBTQ plus Americans. So what we're going to do is
we're going to go to page 584, and this is from their actual website. The Link was on Kamala's page that ends
up sending you over to this page. So 584 Okay, so this is page 584 what we're going to do is we're
going to copy all of Page 584 Okay, so you copy page 584, thank you for sharing the content from the paper.
It appears to discuss several important points related to discrimination and regulatory policies.
Let's break down some key aspects rescinding EO, 11246, the paper suggests that the
President should eliminate the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs OFCCP
by rescinding Executive Order, 11246, EO, 11246, federal contractors would still be
bound by statutory non discrimination law, but would no longer operate under overlapping
regulatory regimes. Contractors remaining obligations under the Rehabilitation Act and the
Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRAA) could be enforced by other agencies such
as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC or the Department of Labor DOL, sex
discrimination and Bostock versus Clayton County, the paper highlights the expansion of sex
discrimination definitions based on The Supreme Court's decision in Bostock versus Clayton
County, Bostock held that firing someone for being homosexual or transgender violates Title VII
prohibition against sex discrimination. However, the court's ruling specifically addressed hiring
and firing none other title seven issues like bathrooms, locker rooms or dress codes, the paper
suggests restricting Bostock application to sexual orientation and transgender status in hiring and
firing contexts. Withdrawal of unlawful notices and guidance. The president should direct agencies
to withdraw unlawful notices and guidance's that broadly apply Bostock reasoning beyond hiring
and firing, this would clarify the scope of sex discrimination protections. Rescinding regulations
on sexual orientation and gender identity, the paper recommends rescinding regulations
that interpret sex discrimination provisions as prohibiting discrimination based on sexual
orientation, gender identity, transgender status and sex characteristics. Overall, the paper
seems to advocate for streamlining regulations, clarifying legal interpretations and ensuring
consistency in enforcing nondiscrimination laws. If you have any specific questions
related to this content, feel free to ask. Okay, so Keenan said it calls for the
elimination of protections for LBGT. So now what we're going to do is we're going to say, Does this information on page 584 call for the elimination of protections for
LBGTQ plus Americans, Question Mark. The information on page 584 does not
explicitly call for the elimination of protections for LGBTQ plus Americans.
Instead, it discusses regulatory policies, the scope of sex discrimination
and potential changes to existing rules. If you have further questions or
need clarification, feel free to ask. Okay, so that would be false.
Let's go back. So, yes, right back to the Stone Age.
I'm afraid. That's terrible. Yeah, it is. Thank you, Becky, for being here and
making that wonderful. point. All right, next up