hello respected people welcome back to respected Minister today we are diving into a tweet from Adam bant leader of the Australian greens where he accuses prime minister Anthony albanesi of presiding over higher climate emissions than his predecessor Scott Morrison B criticizes the government's environmental policies linking them to recent extreme weather events in Australia as expected the public had a lot to say in response to this tweet let's explore these reactions and see what they reveal about the ongoing climate debate in Australia disclaimer the views expressed in this video are based on public tweets and do not necessarily reflect verified facts viewers are encouraged to seek information from reliable news sources the First Response points out that B's claim is unverified and lacks a comprehensive picture especially regarding long-term targets like a 50% ruction in CO2 by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050 the commenter criticizes bant for potentially undermining these goals by engaging in what they describe as wedge politics this reaction reflects a broader concern that political maneuvering could harm the chances of achieving meaningful climate action even among those who generally support environmental initiatives another response is sharply critical of bant and the greens accusing them of abandoning their core values the commenter expresses disappointment with the direction the party has taken under B's leadership and vows never to vote green again this reaction underscores the disillusionment that can occur when a party's actions are perceived to diverge from its original principles leading to a loss of support from its traditional base a third comment at challenges the premise of B's tweet arguing that the extreme weather events mentioned storms in Victoria bushfires in nsw and floods in Tasmania are not new phenomena and have occurred historically the commenter suggests that fear driven rhetoric is unhelpful and that adaptation to the current climate is more important this reaction highlights a perspective that focuses on resilience and adaptation rather than solely on prevention another response takes a global view arguing that even if Australia's emissions were zero it wouldn't make a significant impact without major reductions from larger emitters like China the USA India and Russia the commenter notes that these countries are increasing their nuclear power capacity to help reduce emissions this perspective emphasizes the need for coordinated International efforts and questions the effectiveness of unilateral action by smaller countries like Australia finally a commenter dismisses the focus on climate emissions suggesting instead that the issue is about profit motives and Corruption linked to powerful Global entities they express disbelief that this narrative is still being accepted as legitimate this response reflects a deep cnism about the motivations behind climate policies and the influence of Global Financial interests a view that resonates with some who are skeptical of mainstream climate change discourse in conclusion Adam B's tweet sparked a wide range of reactions from concerns about political strategy and party values to skepticism about the effectiveness of Australia's climate policies as the debate continues it's clear that climate change remains a deeply polarizing issue both within Australia and glob we invite you to share your thoughts in the comments below don't forget to like share and subscribe to respected Minister for more discussions on critical topics