Martin schelly Infamous for hiking drug prices and acquiring wuang Clans Once Upon a Time in sholon for $2 million is now facing legal action from pleaser da a cryptocurrency collective that purchased the album for $475 million after scy was forced to Forfeit it in 2021 to cover Court debts the lawsuit claimed schr violated their agreement by retaining digital copies of the album sharing them on social media and boasting about it online according to the lawsuit scr's actions violated the terms of the sale where pleaser da accused him of widely disseminating digital copies of the album and playing excerpts during live streams all while taunting the collective with messages that mocked their purchase Kelly allegedly admitted to creating multiple copies and distributing them to his followers bragging that the album had earned him favors and boasting about potentially leaking it this legal battle is the latest chapter in The Saga of the album which wuang clan crafted over six years as a singular piece of Contemporary Art meant to be owned as a unique and exclusive artwork the album's Rarity and scr's controversial ownership have made it a symbol of the intersection between art Commerce and legal disputes in the digital age judge Pamela K Chen's ruling is a significant step in this case ordering scr to hand over all copies of the album by Friday and to report any distribution by the end of September case underscores the challenges of enforcing ownership and distri distribution rights in the era of digital media where exclusivity can be easily undermined by unauthorized copying and sharing KY who was released from prison in 2022 after serving time for fraud seems unfazed by the legal threats continuing to mock pleaser da online however the lawsuit could have broader implications for how digital assets and unique artworks are treated in legal terms particularly in cases involving high value transactions and intellectual property rights this case also raises questions about the extent to which digital copies can undermine the value of rare physical artworks especially in an age where sharing and duplication are effortless as the legal battle unfolds it may set a precedent for future disputes involving digital assets and the enforcement of exclusive ownership rights the album itself which was intended to be a one-of-a-kind art piece continues to generate controversy years after its creation reflecting the ongoing tensions between art Commerce and legal framework works in the modern world as this situation develops it will likely draw attention not just for its celebrity connections but for its implications for the future of art ownership in the digital [Music] era for