Kamala Harris' body language at CNN interview exposed INSECURITIES

So Kamala Harris gave her first interview in  this case to CNN and it went exactly as many   of us had predicted. It was a train wreck. But  in my case, it really surprised me because I   never imagined that it was going to be as bad as  this. This is Joe Biden debate levels of bad. And   to prove that, let's jump in on the first clip  so you can understand the magnitude of this,   how this interview actually harmed Kamala Harris,  whatever she's doing on the presidential race. If   you are elected, what would you do on day one  in the White House? Well, there are a number of   things. I will tell you first and foremost, one  of my highest priorities is to do what we can to   support and strengthen the middle class. In the  reaction, you see a couple of things right out   of the gate. We have not only that she's going  to have her eyes all around the place instead   of being on the interviewer. She is not looking  directly at the interviewer. She is looking to the   side or is looking at the table. Some have said,  oh, she might have notes on the table. But no,   we can see in the video that in the bit itself  that the table was empty. She did not have notes.   Whatever she's answering, that's her answering,  which is concerning enough. She's got some   pacifying gestures like this thumb in the corner  of her mouth, which is nervousness. And again,   that couple of things for the first question that  was asked is, it's a bit too much. You know that   the first questions are going to be perhaps the  most important. This case is a rather general one.   What are you going to do on day one? And we also  had this that happened, that she wants to support   and strengthen the middle class, but she denies  with her head when she says it. There it goes.   She is denying with her head. You know that you  can use your head shake to emphasize things. But   in this case, she's not emphasizing anything like  strengthen the middle class. I don't see it as an   emphasis. I'm going to give her the benefit of the  doubt to not be too harsh on her. I'm going to do   it. But at the end of that sentence, you see that  she presses her lips in a bit of frustration, like   resigned about everything or what she just said,  in which in my opinion, is the worst way to end   that first answer. She is looking away, looking at  the table, pacifying gestures of nervousness. She   is shaking her head in an odd way. I could give  her a pass on that. But that lip pressing, I mean,   it's not going well. It's not starting well at  all. We're going to focus on this analysis on   Kamala Harris, by the way. I might do a separate  analysis for Tim Walz because there's a lot to   unpack here. Let's move on. When I look at the  aspirations, the goals, the ambitions of the   American people, I think that people are ready  for a new way forward in a way that generations   of Americans have been fueled by hope and by  optimism. Notice that at this point, she hasn't   really answered the question. She is talking about  hope and aspirations. She was asked a very precise   question. What are you going to do on day one? And  well, she had to be asked that question again. I   think sadly, in the last decade, we have had  in the former president someone who has really   been pushing an agenda and an environment that is  about diminishing the character and the strength   of who we are as Americans. Again, she is not  answering the question. She's saying that, well,   it's Trump's fault for some reason. She is going  totally off the question that was asked. So this   is when I tell you that Dana asks the question  a second time. Really dividing our nation. And   I think people are ready to turn the page on that.  So what would you do day one? Day one, it's going   to be about one, implementing my plan for what  I call an opportunity economy. I've already laid   out a number of proposals in that regard, which  include what we're going to do to bring down the   cost of everyday goods, what we're going to do to  invest in America's small businesses, what we're   going to do to invest in families, for example,  extending the time. There are a couple of things   that I don't understand on Kamala Harris when  she's talking about these topics, especially   family, for example, that she has this like this  smirk on her face, which is rather odd. Maybe she   could be delighted about this. She mentions this  policy a couple of times during the interview.   But I don't know, maybe she was not so sure what  was going to stick. But she mentioned about the   tax break for families, for children, to mute this  track a bit, just to come back to another moment.   It was this part. I have already laid out a number  of proposals in that regard. And she keeps looking   down. She keeps looking at the table. I don't,  again, many people say, oh, she got notes. But   if she had notes, she would be saying concrete  things. She will be giving concrete answers   because the answers will be in the notes. But no,  she's not giving real answers, in fact. So moving   on, she begins to talk about the cost of everyday  goods. That's going to be asked again later. I'm   going to unmute so we can keep listening. To six  thousand dollars for families for the first year   of their child's life to help them buy a car  seat, to help them buy baby clothes. Again,   she's been shaking her head. I'm going to say that  she's emphasizing that families are going to have   all this. It's a bit of dissonance that shaking  her head like no, but I'm going to again give her   a pass. There's so many so many out later that is  really suspicious, much more suspicious than this   head shaking. But let's move on. There's the work  that we're going to do that is about investing   in the American family around affordable  housing, a big issue in our country right   now. Because something that I noticed is that when  she begins to talk about investing in the American   family, she begins to shrug. I pointed out one of  her shoulders, but in fact, it's both shoulders   that she begins to be smaller in that frame.  It's like she's getting nervous about the topic.   Investing in the American family is something, of  course, very vague, very abstract. There's nothing   concrete about that. So I guess that she knew that  that was not cutting it, that she should have been   given more concrete answers. What happens here at  the end of the sentences is that she presses her   lips. I'm going to mute again so you can see  it. She presses her lips at the end of those   sentences. She is upset or nervous or frustrated.  There's a bit of a negative emotion in there. It   doesn't look confident at all between looking at  the table, looking away, and not looking at the   interviewer with conviction of what you're going  to do. And you will be excited to apply all this   to continue your legacy because you're in the  White House right now. You're growing, but this   is not the energy that we see from Kamala Harris.  I could say from a humane perspective, maybe she   has been through a lot of stress lately. Maybe she  hasn't slept well. And she's not even potus yet.   She doesn't look as clever and energetic than in  her public speeches and her rallies. By the way,   something that I want to mention as well is that  the setting was really gray in this case. Let's   say that the work is gray. She was wearing gray.  There was this cafeteria. They wanted to make it   seem like it was a normal conversation between  regular people. But again, it looked really odd,   especially for the fact that Kamala Harris looks  dwarfed, diminished between the interviewer and   Tim Walz. She looks small. It was so odd to  see that. Why did they choose this? And even   the lighting was very bad. And you see all this  darkness and lack of color. That's not much joy   in there. Again, this is all aesthetic decisions  on CNN's production team. And I can guess that   someone at CNN's production team, especially in  terms of who was in charge of picking the angle   and the lighting and everything, they are not fans  of Kamala Harris. They made them look really bad   in that regard. And she asks Tim Walz about "What  About You?" I'm going to skip Tim Walz's parts in   here. Maybe I will do a video about him later.  But let's talk about this. Groceries. - Because   their groceries were less expensive. Housing  was more affordable when Donald Trump was   president. - Well, let's start with the fact that  when Joe Biden and I came in office during the   height of a pandemic, we saw over 10 million jobs  were lost. People by, I mean, literally, we were   all tracking the numbers. Hundreds of people a day  were dying because of COVID. - Okay, to be fair,   yeah, COVID was a real hit to the economy of the  United States. So they had to deal with that. That   is a reality. And again, maybe her body language  is not as reassuring of what was the solution, if   she's proud of what they did. She should be, she's  talking about what the Biden-Harris administration   did, and she looks gloomy and defeated. Doesn't  look like they did something that was recovering,   actually, recovering the economy. - The economy  had crashed. In large part, all of that because of   mismanagement by Donald Trump of that crisis. When  we came in, our highest priority was to do what   we could to rescue America. And today, we know  that we have inflation at under 3%. A lot of our   policies have led to the... - Okay, she said that  inflation was at 3%, which I don't know if that is   the actual official record because I know that my  American friends have been really crushed by high   prices in everything in the last couple of years.  So I don't see any body language markers in here,   her facial expression that were changing when she  said that 3% inflation. So maybe it's something   that she has rehearsed and she actually believed  that had happened, but still is the same gloomy   and defeated body language. - Reality that America  recovered faster than any wealthy nation around   the world. But you are right. Prices in particular  for groceries are still too high. - So there was   3% inflation, which is a bit over the 2% that is  considered healthy inflation, but still prices are   too high. How do you combine both things? In this  case, you're trying to soften the real statement,   the statement of reality that prices are too  high. That is an undeniable fact. But she   began saying that, well, they inherited this bad  economy from Donald Trump. That is something that   every single politician is going to say, so I'm  just going to ignore it. That's normal politics   sphere. But the way that she talks about what  she did, she and Biden did, is not being proud   of what she did, which is something odd because  this is the kind of moments that you have the   opportunity to be hopeful. She's talking about  the middle class, the American middle class to   be hopeful about the future or whatever they're  going to do, they're going to build. She doesn't   project joy or being hopeful about anything  here. - American people know it, I know it,   which is why my agenda includes what we need to do  to bring down the price of groceries. For example,   dealing with an issue like price gouging, what  we need to do to extend the child tax credit,   to help young families be able to take care of  their children in their most formative years,   what we need to do to bring down the cost of  housing. - Okay, I'm going to, for some sections,   I'm going to try to accelerate this, playing at a  double speed. I'm going to begin playing at double   speed. Just after pointing out that she still has  this pressing of the lips every now and then, she   still has this not confident, a bit frustrated,  a bit upset, and it is not looking good. Again,   you know that I'm not Harry's or Wall's fan  at all. I don't, I absolutely don't like the   way their policies, which, by the way, they have  not stated on their website yet, and we are 68,   67 days until the elections. And still, why would  they do and release an interview like this and   make her look this bad? I mean, this is the best  that you could make her look during an interview   on a friendly media, like CNN. And what's worse  is that this interview was originally 41 minutes   long, and it was cut to just 19 minutes or  something like that, like 18 minutes, like a TED   Talk. And that is counting Tim Walz interventions  that I don't understand. Why you want to interview   the one who is going to be, one who is  running to be President of the United States,   and you need Tim Walz by her side doing what  exactly? It's like it was distracting. And again,   the composition of whatever was happening was not  the ideal. Again, I am not a Kamala Harris fan,   but they made so many mistakes here that I want  to point out. This is just terrible in many ways.   It's gloomy, it's not hopeful, and absolutely  not joyful. I'm going to play this in double   speed. My proposal includes what would be a tax  credit of $25,000 for first-time homebuyers,   so they can just have enough to put a down payment  on a home, which is part of the American dream and   their inspiration, but do it in a way that allows  them to actually get on the path to achieving   that goal and that dream. So in some ways, in  many, many, very specific ways, when she says,   for example, of that $25,000 number, she has  some flashes of being proud, of being sure that   what she's going to do. I'm not that sure how  that's going to work, because being practical,   that is only going to make houses be $25,000 more  expensive. But at least she has a glimmer of,   "Okay, I'm sure about this. You're sure that  that's one of the things she's going to do."   That that is not going to work as she expects  it to work, that is another thing. But let's   continue. There comes an important question.  So you have been vice president for three and a   half years. The steps that you're talking about  now, why haven't you done them already? Well,   first of all, we had to recover as an economy  and we have done that. I'm very proud of the   work that we have done that has brought inflation  down to less than 3%. Again, she says that, well,   this time she says that the inflation is less than  3%. And she answered with, very calmly, that was a   question, "Why haven't you done that?" And again,  she mentions the previous period, she mentions   something akin to the economy has to be recovered.  In a sense, that could be true. But how much time   did you need for that? What were the details  of that recovery? What exactly did you do? That   would be interesting to know, but we still don't  know what were the policies to recover the economy   and much less what will be the policies from  this point onwards. But I'm going to play this   at double speed again. You know what, this part,  her body language is pretty much the same. I'm not   going to bother you with the policies. Again, this  is not the policy analysis guide. This is a body   language guide. Many things about her policies. I  have read about the immigration policies. That's   something that I can talk about, but I cannot talk  about the Medicaid policies because I haven't read   about them. So I'm going to skip this part to this  upcoming part of the interview. What we have done   to improve the supply chain so we're not relying  on foreign governments to supply American families   with their basic needs, I'll say that that's good  work. There's more to do, but that's good work.   Okay, finally, a couple of things. She has this,  she presses her lips at the end, but not that   tight. She has better eye contact this time with  the interviewer. So whatever she said previously   about Medicare and capping the insulin costs at  35, she was real about it. She was proud of it.   Maybe if you can confirm or have a comment about  this, the comments are open. But this part,   she was sure and confident of what she had done.  So this is like the baseline of confidence that   she had to show from the beginning and didn't. And  this is kind of mistakes she is making that is not   making her look good in any way. Not that I would  like her to do better because she should have   many advisors to do that work and they have been  paid for. Do you still want to ban fracking? No,   and I made that clear on the debate stage in 2020.  You notice a couple of things here. She says no,   but she says yes with her head. Let's say that  she is saying yes with her head, she's doing this.   Again, we've seen this a couple of times with  these contradictions. I could give her a pass   before when she was denying with her head. I gave  her two passes already. And now she's saying no,   she's not going to ban fracking and she moves  her head this way. That would be three passes.   I never give three passes on my videos. I always  give one and that's it. So I don't think this is   something that we should be... We should trust  what's coming out of her mouth. And the best   part is that the interviewer makes sure to point  a couple of things. Take a look at this. No, and   I made that clear on the debate stage in 2020.  That I would not ban fracking. As vice president,   I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not  ban fracking. There's a very subtle eye flutter   with her blinking. There's a very quick blinking.  I'm going to rewind so you see it. Let's see if   you can catch the quick blinking when she repeats  the fracking thing. Ban fracking. As president,   I will not ban fracking. She just did it right  there. Ban fracking. As president, I will not ban   fracking. In 2019, I believe, at a town hall,  you said, you were asked, would you commit to   implementing a federal ban on fracking on your  first day in office? And you said, there's no   question I'm in favor of banning fracking. So yes.  So she was caught red-handed with the records,   with receipts, that she said that she was going  to ban fracking in 2019. She said that herself,   and you have this sudden surprise on her face.  Like, what? Did I say it? How can you put that   out? How can you expose me in this way? So she was  genuinely surprised by the remark. This is not the   question. The question was if she was going to ban  fracking, and we already know. So there's signals   of nervousness. Right here is in 2018, you  said that you were going to absolutely 100%   ban fracking. And that took her by surprise. That  is important. So it changed in that campaign? In   2020, I made very clear where I stand. We are  in 2024, and I've not changed that position,   nor will I going forward. I kept my word, and  I will keep my word. What made you... Again,   a subtle, very subtle pressing of the lips  right here. Not as strong as other moments,   but she's a bit upset about the expose. What  made you change that position at the time? Well,   let's be clear. My values have not changed.  I believe it is very important that we take   seriously what we must do to guard against what  is a clear crisis in terms of the climate. Okay,   when she begins to talk about the climate, now we  have a real pressing of the lips. You know that   climate is a controversial topic, let's say.  I don't think that should be the most urgent   things in many ways. And again, Kamala Harris  mentions climate a couple of times. She talks   about the Green Deal, talks about the environment.  But not one time. Not one. She mentions anything   regarding nuclear power. And as I've told you  many times, if anyone talks about climate change,   if anyone talks about environmentalism, if anybody  talks about green energy and they don't talk   about nuclear power, they're hypocrites.  It's that simple. It's just a heuristic,   because everybody knows that nuclear power is the  best, the cleanest and safest energy right now. Of   course, it has evolved over time, but right now  it is the cleanest and safest energy. But it's   not the best business in the world, because  you need long-term vision for nuclear power,   because nuclear plants take like eight years to  be built right now. Six to eight years. So yeah,   it's not something that's going to happen in  your term. So maybe that's not something that   politicians want to push. That would not earn them  brownie points. But let's move on. And to do that,   we can do what we have accomplished thus far.  The Inflation Reduction Act. What we have done   to invest, by my calculation, probably a trillion  dollars over the next 10 years. Investing in a   clean energy economy. What we've already done,  creating over 300,000 new clean energy jobs. That   tells me, from my experience as vice president,  we can do it without banning fracking. In fact,   Dana, I cast the tie-breaking vote that actually  increased leases for fracking as vice president.   So I'm very clear about where I stand. And was  there some policy... Okay, at least she's also   had another receipt on her side that she  said that, "I cast the tie-breaking vote   that actually increased leases for fracking as  vice president." So maybe she was told to do so,   or maybe she finally did something. I  don't know. Again, that kind of things,   I think you can help me in the comments. I'm very  clear about where I stand. And was there some   policy or scientific data that you saw that you  said, "Oh, okay, I get it now." What I have seen   is that we can grow and we can increase a thriving  clean energy economy without banning fracking.   During the Biden-Harris administration, there  were record numbers of illegal border crossings.   Why did the Biden-Harris administration wait  three and a half years to implement sweeping   asylum restrictions? Well, first of all, the root  causes work that I did as vice president, that I   was asked to do by the president, has actually  resulted in a number of benefits, including   historic investments by American businesses in  that region. So again, she is trying to soften   the blow of answering the actual question about  immigration. And she wants to start by saying that   American entrepreneurs have invested in the region  that she was in charge of, namely South America   and Central America. And that's the way that you  soften the blow when you're going to get into the   actual talking. Again, there's a lot of stuff in  here that we might need to watch in double speed.   The number of immigrants coming from that region  has actually reduced. She lowered her voice tone   just a bit. I mean, saying that the amount of  immigrants from South and Central America have   been reduced. I don't know. I think the videos  speak for themselves. I think the numbers speak   for themselves. Again, you're free to comment on  that with real hard data, because I don't think   that it's as simple as the vice president  is putting it. - Since we began that work,   but I will say this, that Joe Biden and I, and our  administration, worked with members of the United   States Congress on an immigration issue that is  very significant to the American people and to our   security, which is the border. - Okay, she's going  to talk about the bill that they tried to pass   this bill, and Donald Trump took it down. I don't  know. It's like Donald Trump has this great power   to bring things down. But Donald Trump actually  said that he brought that bill down. I read that   bill. I think it was lukewarm. It was a band-aid  to a huge problem. You have to really close the   border. It's not about having more agents. It's  about actually closing the border, not letting   anybody in. It's something that you can do. It  should be easy to do, right? We're talking about   the security of the United States. But again, you  are free to comment about this. In my opinion,   the bill was to lukewarm, and that's why, well,  Donald Trump tried to, or not tried, he actually   did it. He took that bill down with his friends,  and to try to use it as part of his campaign,   right? That is what they are claiming. And I think  Donald Trump has claimed it as well. Maybe not,   but of course he's going to say it in the sense  that, I took this down because it was not enough.   I'm going to do it the right way, what needs to  be done. I think that is the approach. Again,   you can comment on that. And a pain that they've  experienced. So you would push that legislation   again? I just want to ask about- Not only push it,  I will make sure that it comes to my desk and I   would sign it. She's talking about the immigration  bill that was taken down by Donald Trump. One   other question about something that you said  in 2019 when you first ran. There was a debate,   you raised your hand when asked whether or  not the border should be decriminalized. Do   you still believe that? I believe there should be  consequence. We have laws that have to be followed   and enforced that address and deal with people  who cross our border illegally. I think she was   trying to distance herself from all those videos.  There's more than one in which she said that,   yeah, that illegal immigrants were not criminals,  that they should be decriminalized. But there's   too many to count. That was her stance back  then. And now she's saying that I believe we   have laws in place. She's not talking about the  topic itself. She's talking about the laws that   are written about that, but someone has to enforce  them. Are you going to enforce them or not? She's   not answering the question. And there should be  consequence. And let's be clear, in this race,   I'm the only person who has prosecuted  transnational criminal organizations. OK,   there are a bit of smugness in there. She's  proud about that. I'm going to just jump a   bit to this part, a bit forward. My values have  not changed. You mentioned the Green New Deal.   I have always believed and I have worked on  it that the climate crisis is real. OK, again,   she's jumping from topic to topic in many ways.  We have these different questions and she is   evading most of them. I don't know what Tim Walz  is doing right there by her side besides looking,   making her look smaller. Not a good look. It  doesn't look good at all. And she's not really   answering most of the questions. I would like her  to answer with actual data and actual policies.   But again, she doesn't have those policies, not  even in her website. I believe it is important   to build consensus and it is important to find  a common place of understanding of where we can   actually solve problems. On that note, you had  a lot of Republican speakers at the convention.   Will you appoint a Republican to your cabinet?  Yes, I would. No one in particular in mind. I've   got 68 days to go with this election, so I'm not  putting the cart before the horse, but I would.   OK, this again, I think this is not as important  if she would have a Republican or not. There comes   a rather delicate question. We are getting into  something much more important right now. I want to   ask you about your opponent, Donald Trump. I was a  little bit surprised. People might be surprised to   hear that you have never interacted with him,  met him face to face. That's going to change   soon. But what I want to ask you about is what he  said last month. He suggested that you happened   to turn black recently for political purposes,  questioning a core part of your identity. OK,   this is something that that that pressing of her  mouth, that the way that she presses her mouth,   that's something that she she she hasn't done in  any other part of the interview. I wouldn't that,   of course, that doesn't have a meaning in  itself. But that reaction is not like she   is dismissing it. She wants to dismiss it with  her words. That's it. That's what she's going to   answer. But this is not dismissive. I don't know  how to define this, but I'm going to tell you,   I'm going to I'm going to show you her answer.  I'm going to say something about her answer.   For political purposes, questioning a core part  of your identity. Any same old tired playbook.   Next question, please. That's it. OK. Again, this  is something that she could have she could have   used that question to, well, talk a bit about  herself just for 30 seconds and talk about her   family, talk about the values of being biracial.  I don't know. There's so many things that you can   exploit that. And you skip over that question.  That was odd, especially if the question is about   your main opponent, Donald Trump, the racist,  saying that you're using your race to get ahead   on the on this presidential race. It's a bit of  pun unintended. But again, that's something that   she could have used to frame herself as more  relatable. She wanted to answer questions in   a very shady cafeteria and instead of a proper  setting for a presidential race interview. But   she didn't. I was a bit baffled by this. It's  like she wants to it's like that narrative is   not it's not doing well with the intended target  audience. So she has to skip it. She cannot talk   about that. I'm sure that her advisors told her  any questions about you being black, just skip it.   Dismiss it. This is not something that you should  be talking. That could be exploited if it had some   kind of positive impact on her, the way that her  voters see her. But no, that's why that's why it   was skipped. Policy issues that would be on your  plate if you become commander in chief. Let me   be very clear. I'm unequivocal and unwavering in  my commitment to Israel's defense and its ability   to defend itself. And that's not going to change.  I think she was being truthful in here. She said   it's still the same, a bit insecure body language.  But I think she had warmed up already and she was   beginning to say that the lines that she had to  memorize about her policies with Israel. And I   think it's a real deal. And she repeats them over  and over again. Let's take a step back. October 7.   She talks about October 7, that was this terrible  thing happening in Israel. Many young people were   killed and raped. As I said then, I say today,  Israel has a right to defend itself. We would.   And how it does so matters. Far too many innocent  Palestinians have been killed. You see that the   topic is a landmine and she hasn't practiced  it enough. This is something that you should   practice. What is your stance on the Middle  East? You have to practice it 100 times. No,   Kamala Harris hasn't practiced that question,  that answer 100 times. I can guarantee you.   This is something that she should answer with  the utmost confidence in herself. And this is   the kind of thing, body language is something that  you assess if you are in the Middle East and you   want to know if she is bluffing or what. This is  like poker, but in a global scale. And no, this is   not it. This is not the way to speak about these  issues. We have got to get a deal done. We were   in Doha. We have to get a deal done. This war must  end. In the meantime. And we must get a deal that   is about getting the hostages out. I've met with  the families of the American hostages. Let's get   the hostages out. Let's get the ceasefire done.  But no change in policy in terms of arms and so   forth. No, we have to get a deal done. Diana, we  have to get a deal done. She just begins to repeat   the same sentence over and over again. She says  the sentence like three times. So I'm going to   let's do something. I think I have another part in  here. I'm going to point is this this last part.   President Harris, you were a very staunch defender  of President Biden's capacity to serve another   four years. This one is important. You insisted  that President Biden is extraordinarily strong.   Even where we are now. Do you have any regrets  about what you told the American people? No, not   at all. Not at all. I have. Notice that she fixed  on her seat and look away again when she when she   has to tell the truth about what was going to with  Biden, that she's not going to say it directly.   All that she she was trying to cover up what was  going on with President Biden. And by the way,   where is Biden right now? I think he's on vacation  right now. Who is running the country? Served with   President Biden for almost four years now. And  I'll tell you, it's one of the greatest honors   of my career. Truly. He cares so deeply about the  American people. OK, blah, blah, blah. Let's skip   here. The American people rightly deserve in their  president. By contrast, the former president has   none of that. Of course, she had to mention Trump  at some point. But again, she says that Biden was   so great, was amazing, was so everything. But  nobody can explain why Biden was really dropping   out of the race. And then she's asked about what  was she doing if Biden endorsed her immediately or   afterwards or whatever. And she tells a story  about that she was in this family meeting and   reunion. And she got the call from Biden saying  that I'm dropping out of this. And I don't know,   it's a bit contrary. But again, there are a couple  of things I want to take from this analysis. It   was a lot to unpack. It was more than 19 minutes  of Kamala Harris speaking. Again, I will be doing   a separate video about Tin Walls. But this is in  any way, this is not in any way how you inspire   confidence in anybody. Again, you know that I'm  not a Kamala Harris fan. I will point the mistakes   of CNN, of Kamala Harris, of her advisors.  That's what I do. But no, this is not going to,   this is going to impact her negatively in ways  that most people are beginning to comprehend   right now. This was very bad. It was a train wreck  interview, both in terms of body language, both in   terms of how she evaded questions and did not give  direct answers and how the answers were critical,   like the Middle East conflict. That's something  that you should have, like know the palm of your   hand in every single way. And no, not in terms  of your verbal ability, not in terms of your body   language. There's no confidence in here. And that,  well, that is Kamala Harris in essence. And this   is just the first interview that was cut short  by CNN on Kamala Harris running for president.   But again, I would love to know what you think  about this in the comments. This might not be   the last video I will make about this interview.  I'm sure that I'm going to spot many other things   down the line. So maybe I will be doing a second  video about this. Remember to download my free   100 body language tips in the description and  you will get subscribed to my email updates   as well. My name is Jesús Enrique Rosas. I'm  the Body Language Guy. Much love and bliss.