Trending searches: how to watch the presidential debate
Intro welcome back to unbiased your favorite source of unbiased news and legal analysis welcome back to unbiased today is Wednesday September 11th and this is your daily news rundown let's start with some important admin things first as those of you can probably tell watching on YouTube I am back home and in studio flew home on the rede last night but the conference went great A lot of you asked about it you wanted to know you know what it was all about so this was an annual event called Lex Summit which is put on by a legal tech company called fevine it was a 2 to three day event there were tons of people there many chats just like mine over the course of the few days but in my Q&A specifically we spoke about my transition out of the law and how I transitioned into doing what I do today on social media and hosting the podcast so it was really great once that footage becomes available perhaps I can share it with you on YouTube or something but I will keep you posted I also want to note the significance of today before we get into today's episode today is of course the 23rd anniversary of 9/11 and I just want to say that I'm thinking of anyone and everyone that has you know been impacted by the tragic events that took place 23 years ago today and I hope that all of you out there take at least one minute today to think of the victims their families the survivors the First Responders our veterans and our troops as well as how we are able able to come together simply As Americans on a day like today and finally as far as the format of today's episode we will start with an update to Monday's episode we'll then do a little presidential debate fact check and then we will finish with some quick hitters the usual daily critical thinking segment will return tomorrow along with rumor has it which is that new Thursday segment where I you know clear up some recent rumors and now without further Ado let's get into today's stories first let's start with Michigan Supreme Court Says Kennedy Must Stay on Ballot an update to Monday's episode so right after I released Monday's episode which included a conversation about Kennedy's current legal proceedings surrounding the removal of his name from some State ballots the Michigan Supreme Court went ahead and reversed the Appellate decision that I had just reported on in Monday's conversation we spoke about the appell at Court ruling that said Kennedy could be taken off the state ballot because one the election law that the state of Michigan was trying to use to prohibit Kennedy from withdrawing didn't apply to Federal candidates and two the election law that does apply to Federal candidates doesn't mention anything about withdraw being prohibited or anything about withdrawal period but what the state supreme court said on Monday is that because there is no law that mentions withdrawal for federal candidates he cannot be taken off so quite an opposite ruling there the ruling out of the state supreme court was 5 to2 the two dissenting justices wrote that by keeping Kennedy on Michigan's state ballot quote the secretary of state is improperly and needlessly denying the electorate a choice between persons who are actual candidates willing to serve if elected and quote and I will say on that just so we're all on the same page Kennedy is willing to serve if he's elected it's just that at this point he knows he won't be elected so any ballot that has his name on it is just a detractor mainly from Trump according to him so it's not that he's not willing to serve it's just that it's impossible to serve at this point now Kennedy is trying one more Avenue he has filed a lawsuit in federal court which means that he'll have to go through the federal court system so the district court then the appell at circuit then up to the Supreme Court of the United States if need be an answer from the Supreme Court of the United States would be a final answer and would overrule the state Supreme Court's ruling so we'll see what happens with that but that's where that story stands as of now now let's move on to Presidential Debate Fact-Check the debate so last night former president Trump and vice president Harris squared off in their first and possibly only presidential debate it was a bit more contentious at times than Trump's debate with Biden and it seemed that despite the candidates mics being turned off when they weren't speaking because that was a big uh rule controversy leading up to the debate their mics actually were turned back on when they tried to speak with an off mic so they weren't really too strict about that rule the moderators which were David Mir and lindsy Davis of ABC News fact checked Trump a couple of times live on air but notably didn't fact check Harris and as we'll see in just a second both candidates did make their fair share of misleading and false claims I do want to say before we get into it let me just set your expectations now I'm not going to be dispelling Andor clarifying every single claim that was made in this debate I will definitely do quite a few but I can't personally cover every single one with a one day turnaround time so if there is any claim in particular in particular that you want the facts on and I don't cover it in this episode I encourage you to try to look into it for yourself and if you still don't know what's true and not true after you know trying to dig in you can always reach out to me via email and I'll try to cover it in a later episode but no no guarantees there with that out of the way let's start with the first claim and these are in no particular order first haris said Trump's proposed tariffs which she calls the trump sales tax would result in a roughly $4,000 annual tax increase for a middle inome family what Harris was referring to was Trump's proposal for at least a 10% tariff on most Imports and at least a 60% tariff on China Chinese Imports but her claim needs some context so here's the deal tariffs are essentially taxes that are imposed on Goods that come into our country right they can be good for promoting domestic production and domestic employment but the costs of tariffs often impact the consumer by way of higher prices of not only the good being taxed but also complimentary goods and on top of that domestic producers tend to raise their prices at the same rates as importers which just leads to overall higher prices but how much would such a proposal affect us as consumers the analyses contradict one another a bit so when a liberal Think Tank analyzed the annual cost for middle- inome families with a 20% tariff on most Imports which is slightly higher than Trump's proposal and a 60% tariff on Chinese Goods which is equivalent to Trump's proposal it calculated about 3,900 annually per family and that is the number Harris used last night but a non partisan Think Tank analyzed the effects of a 10% tariff on most Imports and a 60% tariff on Chinese Goods which is Trump's proposal and it said the tariffs would result in a lower average after tax income by about 1,800 per family so different numbers depending on what data you look at but it's also worth noting that the added burden on American households due to these tariffs could be offset by tax cuts so there's the context for you next one Trump said he had virtually no inflation despite imposing tariffs this also needs context he did have inflation but the inflation was considered healthy inflation right so in in January 2017 when he took office the Consumer Price Index was roughly 242 the Consumer Price Index represents the relative cost of a basket of common goods in that year when Trump left office in January 2021 the index was at 261 this means that the Consumer Price Index went up about 7.7% over four years which is an average of 1.9% annual inflation now the FED considers 2% to be the goal so one 1.9% annually is a great Target as far as inflation is concerned but the point here is that he didn't have no inflation like he said next one Harris called the various State abortion bans Trump abortion bans and called project 2025 Trump's project 2025 when Harris says Trump abortion bans she's referring to these abortion bans in the red states that have severely restricted abortion it's kind of like how she calls the Tariff proposal Trump's sales tax but Trump didn't enact these abortion bands himself right what he did do is he returned the issue of of abortion to the states which is what led to these bands but they're not really his bands in the sense that he didn't enact them similarly with uh project 2025 this is something I've talked about before but it's not Trump's project 2025 yes Trump is very well connected to many of the authors of project 2025 as well as the Heritage Foundation which is the organization leading project 2025 but Trump himself is not a part of it and he has said that many times Trump's actual platform or agenda is called agenda 47 and that is his and it can be found on his website agenda 47 is different than project 2025 and not nearly as extreme next Trump said that between 10 and 21 million people maybe more have crossed the border during the Biden Harris Administration the number that he was referring to is encounters at the border so data from the border shows that between February 2021 and July 2024 there were roughly 10 million border encounters now encounters are different than Crossings in that people can be turned away so 10 million encounters doesn't mean 10 million Crossings however not included in that 10 million number are those that were able to completely evade border patrol right and crossover undetected those individuals are obviously not accounted for House Republicans have estimated that that figure is about 1.7 million but even assuming that number is accurate that would still be far less than the 21 million maybe more number referenced by Trump in the debate last night next one Harris said if Trump took office he would be immune from any and you know what let me just back up to that last one for just one quick second what Trump said is that it wasn't between 10 and 21 million what he said is that 10 million were is what was reported but he thinks that it's more like 21 million maybe more so that was his claim specifically and that is the context that you need to know next one Harris said if Trump took office he would be immune from any misconduct while serving as president per the Supreme Court's recent decision in Trump versus the United States this also needs context what the Supreme Court said is that actions stemming from core constitutional powers of the president are completely immune from Criminal prosecution official acts of the president which are different are presumptively immune and unofficial acts have no immunity at all so it's not that Trump could just take office and do whatever he wanted and be you know completely immune from prosecution however he would be immune as would any president when it comes to actions stemming from core Constitutional Powers and presumptively immune from those official acts and and of course no immunity for unofficial acts next one Trump said migrants in Springfield Ohio are eating people's pet dogs and cats both the city manager and local police have said there has been no evidence of this claim the police department saying that they have not received any such reports of any pets being stolen or eaten for that matter the claim originated from someone on Facebook who said they were a local resident in Springfield and and shared a story about a neighbor's daughter's friend who allegedly had their dog stolen and eaten but again there have been no credible reports of this there was a Springfield resident that spoke up at a local public meeting recently and there's video of this that told City commissioners that the Haitian migrants specifically are quote in the park grabbing up Ducks by their neck and cutting their head off and eating them end quote so that's the extent of what we know there but there's no actual evidence of pets being killed and eaten next one Trump claimed inflation was at the highest it's ever been under the Biden Administration that is false it's true that the 99.1% inflation rate in June 2022 was the highest inflation rate in about 40 years but inflation was higher in 1980 when it hit close to 15% and in 1917 when it was near 18% next one Harris claimed Trump left the Biden Administration with the worst unemployment rate since the Great Depression this is false it's true that in April of 2020 the unemployment rate Rose to 14.8% because of the pandemic and this was the highest rate since 1939 but by the time Trump left office in January 2021 and handed things over to Biden the unemployment rate was back down to 6.4% Which is far lower than what the employment rate was during the Great Depression next one Trump stated every legal scholar democrat or republican wanted the issue of abortion brought back to to the states after Row versus Wade I've covered this before this needs context the reality is some legal Scholars wanted it brought back to the States others wanted it enshrined in federal law so it's not that everyone wanted the issue returned to the states what Trump is referring to here is that many legal Scholars including former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who is very much supportive of the right to abortion felt that the legal basis the legal principle which Row versus Wade was based on was flawed Ginsburg specifically felt that deciding Roe based on privacy which the court did would subject the issue to vulnerabilities she felt it should have been more cemented as a gender equality issue instead she also felt that the court shouldn't have made such a sweepingly broad decision like it did because the issue in Row versus Wade was actually much more specific so she felt that by sort of you know not necessarily sticking to the issue at hand and issuing this broad sweeping decision it it launched a more aggressive anti-abortion campaign and it actually went against what pro-choice individuals were trying to achieve but it's not accurate to say that all legal Scholars felt abortion should be an issue for the states that's just not true next one Harris implied that her proposed $50,000 tax deduction for new small businesses will help everyone quote pursue their Ambitions end quote however it is important to note that the new uh the only new small businesses that would be able to benefit benefit from this tax deduction are those businesses that have actually turned a profit that's because you have to have taxable income to deduct against so this tax deduction wouldn't necessarily help all business owners get off the ground from the get-go and quote unquote pursue their Ambitions you have to make a profit first before you can claim this deduction second to last one Trump claimed that some states allow abortions in the eth and 9th month and even after birth calling those specifically executions we've covered this claim before but killing a baby after birth is called infanticide infanticide is illegal in all 50 states there is not one state where you can kill a baby after it's born there are states that do allow late term abortions in the 7th 8th and 9th months uh but not after birth again that would be INF fanticide New Jersey Vermont Oregon Colorado and New Mexico are some of the states that have no time limit on abortions Trump specifically has previously referred to and he did this last night to former governor of Virginia who he who Trump said said that a baby would be born and they would essentially decide what to do with it once it was born here's what the governor the former governor of Virginia said in 2019 he said quote third trimester abortions are done in cases where there may be severe deformities there may be a fetus that's non-viable so in this particular example if a mother is in labor I can tell you exactly what would happen the infant would be delivered the infant would be kept comfortable the infant would be recessed hesitated if that's what the mother and the family desired and then a discussion would ensue between the Physicians and the mother end quote those comments came as he discussed a bill in Virginia that loosened restrictions on late term abortions so that is the statement that Trump often refers to and finally Harris claimed that as of yesterday there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone or any war zone around the world which she says is the first time this Century as we know United States service members are currently stationed in the Middle East and have come under Fire repeatedly just in the last few months last month eight service members were treated for traumatic brain injuries and smoke inhalation after a drone strike in Syria in January three United States soldiers were killed and dozens more injured at a small Outpost in Jordan and that same month two Navy Seals died after going missing at Sea trying to seize lethal Aid being transported from Iran to Yemen so there are certainly uh US service members in you know combat zones that Quick Hitters concludes the fact check segment of this episode as I said in the beginning I'm not going to be able to get to everything but I try to get to the ones that I felt you would want to hear about the most now let's move on to some quick hitters we'll start with that SpaceX Mission I was talking about a couple of weeks ago it ended up launching early Tuesday morning this is the one that's the first attempt at a private commerci commercial spacewalk so it launched early yesterday morning from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida as of this morning the spacecraft had completed six orbits of Earth at about 1,400 kilm which is the furthest humans have traveled in space since the Apollo program more than 50 years ago throughout the day today it performed four Burns to lower itself to a lower orbit in preparation for tomorrow's spacewalk P Diddy was ordered by a Michigan judge to pay $100 million over an alleged sexual assault at a 1997 party a 51-year-old man who's currently in prison himself was awarded $100 million after didd he failed to show up to court the man says that Diddy urged him to have sex with multiple women at a party and that he passed out after drinking a glass of alcohol given to him by Diddy and when he woke up Diddy said he did it to him the man who launched these accusations has quite the record himself mainly criminal sexual conduct and kidnapping which are completely unrelated to Diddy and it's worth mentioning that the reason he obtained the $100 million judgment is simply because Diddy didn't show up to court it's not because the evidence was uh proven by a preponderance of the evidence this is what's called a default judgment so because he didn't show up he got a judgment against him so there's a good likelihood this gets overturned on appeal or at the very least gets significantly reduced today's report from the labor department shows inflation has hit a three-year low the Consumer Price Index Rose 2.5% % in August from a year earlier which is down from 2.9% in July remember that Target is 1.9% so due to the drop we may see a quartero interest rate cut from the FED next week speaker Johnson announced today despite a vote being scheduled there would actually be no vote on the gop's continuing resolution for government funding in making the announcement Johnson seemed to imply the pull of the vote was due to division within the GOP party he said quote no vote today we are having thoughtful conversations family conversations within the Republican conference and I believe we will get there end quote those were the quick hitters and as I mentioned at the beginning of this episode there is no critical thinking segment today but that will return tomorrow along with the segment we all know and love rumor has it where I again clear up some recent rumors thanks so much for being with me today have a great night and I will talk to you tomorrow [Music]