it's coming from the russan Govern car attorney general tomorrow is the first Hearing in the January 6 case against the former president since the superseding in this he's called these new charges election interference and a violation of the justice department policy against doing something too close to the election how do you respond to that and how confident are you that your team has followed instructions from Supreme Court following that decision I I stand by the actions of the special counsel the superseding indictment is an effort to respond to the direct instructions of the Supreme Court as to how to effectuate a new indictment in an ongoing case the special councel is required by the regulations to follow the policies of the justice department including the election sensitivities policies and I'm quite confident that he can last question Pier in terms of the Russian interference can you be more specific in terms of is it Beyond Sewing divide of pushing a particular candidate this election cycle what can you give us a sense about the ultimate goal of these ACS um as I said the effort in this case is to affect the preferred outcome of the presidential election the documents that we are unsealing today including the internal reeling documents I point you to those to see exactly what's involed more generally the uh Director of National Intelligence test has testified that Russia's um um preferences have not changed from the preceding election thank you everyone